Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Uber Driver Is Employee, CA Labor Commission Rules

Posted By on Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:24 AM

click to enlarge "Without drivers such as Plaintiff, Defendant's business would not exist." - 360B / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM
  • 360b / Shutterstock.com
  • "Without drivers such as Plaintiff, Defendant's business would not exist."

A San Francisco Uber driver was an employee of the ride-hail company, not an independent contractor, the California Labor Commission has ruled. 

A court ruling filed yesterday reveals that the labor commission found that Barbara Ann Berwick was an employee of Uber when she drove for the company for two months in 2014, and is therefore entitled to reimbursement for her expenses. Uber claimed that Berwick, like all of its drivers, was an independent contractor. The full filing is embedded below. 

The proper classification of workers using app-based platforms is a key question for the growing on-demand economy. As SF Weekly reported in "Codependent Contracting," companies like Uber, Lyft, Handy, and Postmates claim that they are merely technology companies and that the people who use their platforms to work — drivers, cleaners, delivery couriers — are independent contractors. Independent contractors are not eligible for basic employment protections like minimum wage laws, overtime, unemployment insurance, worker's compensation insurance, and the right to organize a union. 

That contention has been challenged by a number of class action lawsuits brought by attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan arguing that the workers are indeed employees and should be protected by employment law. In an interview with SF Weekly, Liss Riordan cited the 1989 court case, S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. vs. Department of Industrial Relations, as precedent for why Uber and Lyft drivers should be deemed employees. That case involved a pickle farm and the farm workers who picked the crop:
The grower claimed that the farmworkers were independent contractors because, "They manage their own labor, share the profit or loss from the crop, and agree in writing that they are not employees." The court found against that argument: "[The grower] simply chooses to accomplish one integrated step in the production of one such crop by means of worker incentives rather than direct supervision.... In no practical sense are the 'sharefarmers' entrepreneurs operating independent businesses for their own accounts."
In yesterday's ruling, the Labor Commission cited the Borello decision, writing:

Plaintiff's work was integral to Defendants' business. Defendants are in business to provide transportation services to passengers. Plaintiff did the actual transporting of those passengers. Without drivers such as Plaintiff, Defendant's business would not exist.

Defendants hold themselves out as nothing more than a neutral technological platform, designed simply to enable drivers and passengers to transact the business of transportation. The reality, however, is that the Defendants are involved in every aspect of the operation.
In this particular case, the court ruled that the plaintiff is entitled to $4,152.20 in reimbursement for the expenses she accrued driving for Uber. That may be a drop in the bucket for the multi-billion dollar company, but it could be a harbinger of tougher times to come for a company completely dependent on independent contracting. 

Uber vs Berwick Finding


  • Pin It

Tags: , , , , , , ,

About The Author

Julia Carrie Wong

Bio:
Julia Carrie Wong's work has appeared in numerous local and national titles including 48hills, Salon, In These Times, The Nation, and The New Yorker.

Comments


Comments are closed.

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook

Slideshows

  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"