Time to buy that ticket to Denver.
California voters will have to wait until 2016 for the chance to legalize marijuana, after the Drug Policy Alliance announced it had scuttled plans to push a marijuana legalization ballot initiative this year, the LA Times first reported yesterday.
Despite a majority of California voters voicing support for ending cannabis prohibition in the polls, the decision boiled down to money -- as in not enough of it to run and win a statewide campaign, which could cost as much as $10 million.
That was money nobody was willing to spend, which is bit weird in day and age when young people with bulging pockets talking about how "disruption" are a dime a dozen. But in any event, the big-money backers from Silicon Valley or anywhere else never materialized.
You will only find a legal adult marijuana marketplace in Colorado and Washington for a few more years. Meanwhile, pot-friendly Californians can spend that time ruing the chance lost in 2010.
But 2014 was always going to be a stretch for a legalization measure. In fact, it wasn't until recently that legalization in California became plausible. Still, the raising and then dashing of hope stings. Who's responsible for this bummer? A lot of people, most of whom are rich. Let's begin.I had hoped we'd be able to legalize marijuana in California in November 2014 but 2016 will be the year it happens. http://t.co/2nuq9oZ4Gj
— Ethan Nadelmann (@ethannadelmann) February 18, 2014
The billionaires behind the Drug Policy Alliance's Control, Regulate and Tax Marijuana Act were George Soros and the late Peter Lewis, who died last year. They were the same bankrollers who put Prop. 215, California's landmark 1996 medical marijuana law, on the ballot.
It was thought that some Silicon Valley icons, including early Facebook employee Dustin Moskovitz and Sean Parker -- both of whom contributed to failed legalization effort Prop. 19 in 2010 -- would shell out to make drug reform history. They did not.
With two months left before an April 18 deadline to gather 500,000 signatures from registered voters, and a higher-turnout election in 2016 to look forward to, backers pulled the plug on Monday night.
Not everyone is lamenting. As with Prop. 19, some ardent marijuana supports think the proposed law -- a 25 percent tax on retail weed, strict possession and cultivation limits of six plants, and new crimes about providing weed to kids on the books -- was far too draconian and written with leery soccer moms and hostile law enforcement in mind. That strategy really didn't work in 2010.
Keep in mind as well the unwilling but powerful minority in California: politicians and police. Tough-on-crime types have been hellbent on cockblocking reform of the state's much-criticized medical marijuana industry; it stands to reason they would have stepped in front of oncoming trains to halt legalization.
And, yes, it is true that three other groups are trying to circulate petitions to qualify their statewide legalization initiatives for the ballot. None of them to date have showed the ability to raise the money.
So, weed is still illegal. Blame a billionaire. What iniquities will the 1 percent come up with next?