Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Lyft Sued for Unfair Competition and Labor Violations (Update)

Posted By on Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:50 AM

Update, 12:45 p.m.: Lyft's response: "The lawsuit is without merit and we look forward to resolving it quickly and effectively."


The rideshare battles that took place outside City Hall a few weeks ago have now moved, unequivocally, into San Francisco district court.

We saw inklings of that when two drivers filed a class action complaint against Uber two weeks ago, alleging that the company had skimmed their tips and misled its clientele. And now its competitor Lyft faces a similarly themed class action, in which plaintiff Patrick Cotter alleges that the company misclassifies its drivers as independent contractors.

That driver-for-hire categorization is a lingua franca for rideshare services, because it helps distinguish them as startups that produce technology, rather than conventional cab fleets with an employed labor force. Lyft, Uber, SideCar, and their other sharing-economy brethren have argued, time and again, that their only products are apps, and that their only function is to refer drivers to passengers. The drivers provide their own cars, their own gas, and even their own insurance policies -- albeit with a promise of million-dollar per-incident excess liability from each company.

Now it's for courts to decide whether that business model truly serves the public interest.

The latest lawsuit, filed Tuesday, argues that drivers like Cotter are in fact employees of Lyft, which means they warrant protection from the California Labor Code. Thus, Lyft should be prohibited from skimming 20 percent from drivers' gratuities, and it should provide wage statements that accurately reflect the number of hours that each driver worked. It should also reimburse drivers for mileage, Cotter argues, echoing charges from the Uber case.

The suit demands $4.5 million in class-wide damages, based on calculations that most drivers average $15 per tip, and Lyft filches 20 percent of that. The plaintiffs and their San Francisco-based lawyer, Matthew Carlson, also have Lyft on the hook for an estimated $2 million in derelict wage statements, and another $4.5 million in mileage costs for the 1.5 million Lyft rides granted so far. Cotter also wants the rideshare service to pay his attorney fees.

We are still waiting for comment from Lyft. Carlson says he's content to allow the allegations to stand for themselves, but he's anxious to hear Lyft's response. But in the meantime, here's the complaint:


  • Pin It

About The Author

Rachel Swan

Rachel Swan

Rachel Swan was a staff writer at SF Weekly from 2013 to 2015. In previous lives she was a music editor, IP hack, and tutor of Cal athletes.

Suggested Reading


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook


  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"