Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Monday, December 3, 2012

District 7 Recount's Potential Costs Tabulated

Posted By on Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:59 AM

click to enlarge Sixty-nine! Sixty-nine thousand dollars!
  • Sixty-nine! Sixty-nine thousand dollars!

Anyone examining the bizarre and tedious process of recounting a district election may be wondering, since these things are so much fun, why don't we do more of them? The answer, as revealed late Friday by the Department of Elections, is that they're not cheap.

In order to get the ball rolling in a recount of the District 7 contest in which Norman Yee eked out a 132-vote win over F.X. Crowley, it's going to require a check for a shade over $10,000 (and $200 more if a manual recount is desired). And, as is so often the case, this payment earns one the right to start making more and bigger payments.

See Also: Prior District 7 Coverage

The recount is officially being called for by District 7 resident Linda Plack, who is represented by San Francisco's top elections lawyer, Jim Sutton, and backed by a consortium of labor organizations supporting Crowley.

Sutton had requested both manual and machine recounts, but, within a letter and trove of documents and spreadsheets sent out Friday afternoon, Arntz cited case law stating you can use one method or the other, but not both. So, should Plack/Sutton/Unions/Crowley opt for the manual recount, it'll run an estimated $69,443. And should they go the machine route, it'll cost $62,416. If the recount proceeds, the estimated day's costs will be submitted to the recount proponents prior to work commencing on a daily basis.

The heaviest bite of a machine count, not surprisingly, deals with the machine. It would run an estimated $40,000: One project manager, one "WinEDS specialist," and two operators would be required at $8,000 a day for two days of testing and three days of counting.

A dozen recount board members earning $125 daily stipends and staffers ranging from warehouse supervisors to sheriff's deputies would push the personnel costs of a manual recount to around $52,500.

Whether any of this will make a dent in Yee's 132-vote victory -- a margin of 0.54 percent -- is unclear. It would seem, however, to be exceedingly unlikely. According to an analysis by the nonprofit organization FairVote, of 18 statewide recounts between the years 2000 and 2009, the average margin change was only 0.03 percent and the largest was 0.11 percent -- far below what Crowley would need to topple Yee.

Arntz's cost estimate requested a cashier's check be delivered to the Department of Elections by 10 a.m. today. According to Elections staff, that did not occur.

Our call to Crowley has not yet been returned. It remains to be seen if the recount is being rethought.

Update, 12:10 p.m.:
John Arntz says Sutton told him there will be no recount.

  • Pin It

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

About The Author

Joe Eskenazi

Joe Eskenazi

Joe Eskenazi was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left. "Your humble narrator" was a staff writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015. He resides in the Excelsior with his wife, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook


  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"