Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Obama's New Marijuana Policies Also Target Alt-Weeklies and the Bill of Rights

Posted By on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:59 AM

  • Say, is that hemp? Kill it!
Say, is that hemp? Kill it!
​In their unrelenting quest to kill legal medical marijuana dead, President Barack Obama and the United States Department of Justice appear content to incur collateral damage.

Last week, property owners who rent to dispensaries were informed that the federal government could seize their properties within 45 days; this week, one of the four United States attorneys who declared open season on anything connected to state-legal cannabis told California Watch that the fourth estate is next. Specifically, the administration says any publication -- from print to web to broadcasting -- that accepts advertisements from medical marijuana businesses could face prosecution.

In other words, Barack Obama will screw California alt-weeklies, some of which rely on medical marijuana ads for 25 to 30 percent of advertising revenue, sources say. But in this move, legal and media experts contacted by SF Weekly say that the government has a First Amendment issue on its hands.

Could the Constitution become a victim of Washington's weed-killing zeal, too?

It was U.S. Attorney Laura E. Duffy, Uncle Sam's top barrister in the Southern District of California, who told California Watch on Wednesday that her office is "going to be moving onto [prosecuting publications] as part of the enforcement efforts in Southern California." Duffy said that she couldn't speak for her three counterparts, including U.S. Attorney for Northern California Melinda Haag, but noted that federal prosecutors' efforts on state-legal weed have been coordinated thus far.

Haag, the U.S. Attorney for Northern California and author of cease-and-desist letters sent to at least four Bay Area dispensaries, did not respond to a request from SF Weekly for comment. Josh Eaton, a spokesman for Haag's office -- which has responded with silence to all press inquiries for some months now -- has nothing to say to us.

"We're not commenting on this issue," he said. 

Legal and media experts contacted by SF Weekly could not name a situation in which a newspaper shut down due to losses in revenue after federal prosecutors went after advertisers. Still, there is precedent that shows the feds mean business: Google recently shelled out $500 million to the federal government for selling ads to Canadian pharmacies willing to sell generic prescription drugs to Americans.

Newspaper publishers declined to comment on the record, but it's no secret that alt-weeklies, including SF Weekly, rely heavily on the medical marijuana industry for ad dollars -- just pick up a newspaper and see for yourself. Indeed, the additional revenue gleaned from pot ads allowed the Sacramento News and Review to hire additional staff, according to California Report.

Yet this may be a prosecution too far, says Liz Enochs, president of the Northern California chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists. "Regardless of how you feel about medical marijuana, this is about economics -- and, by extension, the First Amendment," she said. "An attack on the business model of news organizations could be seen as a de facto attack on the press."

There's contention that this latest federal move is mere saber-rattling, meant to scare dollars away from medical marijuana. That newspapers challenged in court would likely win, according to Peter Scheer, Executive Director of the First Amendment Coalition, is fuel for that fire. 

The government can and does ban illegal advertising, such as an advert for whites-only housing. "However, the illegal status of the service or product must be clear and certain -- otherwise, publishers will self-censor, refusing advertising that is, in fact, constitutionally protected," Scheer told SF Weekly. "In California, where state law says one thing, and federal law says the opposite, publishers can't achieve the requisite degree of certainty."

This ambiguity "confers protection, under the First Amendment, against federal enforcement actions, whether criminal or civil, against them," he said.

In other words, if the federal government is serious about punishing the news for cashing state-legal businesses' checks, it has its work cut out for them. But no amount of First Amendment outrage may be enough save an already-struggling industry from a government-sponsored threat.

Follow us on Twitter at @TheSnitchSF and @SFWeekly. Follow the cannabis reporting of Chris Roberts, who picked a real winner with that career decision, on Twitter at @chroberts_yeah.

  • Pin It

Tags: , , , , , , ,

About The Author

Chris Roberts

Chris Roberts has spent most of his adult life working in San Francisco news media, which is to say he's still a teenager in Middle American years. He has covered marijuana, drug policy, and politics for SF Weekly since 2009.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook


  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"