Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

S.F. Voter Pamphlet to Cease Listing Which Candidates Agreed to Spending Limits

Posted By on Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:30 AM

If you offer your vote according to which candidate accepted to spend no more than the city's voluntary expenditure ceiling -- there must be some of you -- well, then we've got bad news. You're going to have to do a little more work to figure out who's minding the city's rules and who's potentially breaking the bank.

Starting on the first of the year, the city's Voter Information Pamphlet will no longer list which candidates agreed to the spending limit and which didn't. Depending upon your worldview, this move either cleans up a paradoxical situation in which those who may well have spent like Croesus in Vegas were rewarded with the designation of being fiscally restrained -- or is yet another concession to big money.

Proponents of the change -- which, officially "delete(s) the requirement that the Director of Elections publish notices in the Voter Information Pamphlet indicating which candidates have accepted the voluntary expenditure ceiling" point out that, by the time a candidate was listed as having accepted to rein in his or her spending in the pamphlet, it may not have been true in reality.

"The Voter Information Pamphlet goes to print well in advance to the election, and the ceilings are often lifted and then changed in September and October," said John St. Croix, executive director of the Ethics Commission. "So the information in the VIP is often incomplete and often inaccurate, and probably not a good use of city money or space in the voter guide."

Others, however, feel this is a clear concession to big-money campaigns that never intended to abide by the spending limits. "It does serve to debase the value of the pledge to comply," said Charles Marsteller, the former San Francisco head of California Common Cause. Larry Bush, one of the authors of the Ethics Charter in 1993, was also upset. "It's a surprising development considering government at every level is trying to make information more transparent -- and certainly San Francisco is viewed by its own officials as being in the lead in this regard. Certainly this does not benefit those people who subscribe to the voter mandate on spending limits. More importantly, it does not benefit the public."

Voters who wish to know who's naughty and who's nice regarding campaign spending will have to either visit the Ethics Commission Web site or rely upon journalists to start squawking.

Supervisor Sean Elsbernd doesn't foresee much of either. When asked if this move was a good thing or a bad thing, he replied "I don't see it as much of a thing at all.

"In all my years campaigning, I never came across one person who asked me if I accepted campaign limits or not," he continued.

And, for the record, he didn't.

  • Pin It

Tags: , , , , , ,

About The Author

Joe Eskenazi

Joe Eskenazi

Joe Eskenazi was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left. "Your humble narrator" was a staff writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015. He resides in the Excelsior with his wife, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook


  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"