Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Friday, November 20, 2009

Partial Settlement in Carpenters' Racial Discrimination Case

Posted By on Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:30 AM

click to enlarge Bob the Builder never had to call Bob the Lawyer...
  • Bob the Builder never had to call Bob the Lawyer...
Eight of the 28 plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against companies at a Bayview construction site for alleged discrimination and labor law violations -- including running segregated work crews, turning away black workers in favor of Latinos, and extorting wage kickbacks from the Latinos -- have settled with the companies and dropped out of the suit. The eight former plaintiffs are set to receive their checks Friday.  

The remaining 20 carpenters will push forward with a lawsuit in federal court against housing giant AIMCO and several of the subcontractors working on AIMCO's federally subsidized housing units on the hill overlooking the Hunter's Point Shipyard: Fortney and Weygandt, Inc.; IMR Contractor Corporation; Bay Building Services; and Bay Area Construction Framers.

The alleged practices at the construction site that seemed plucked

right out of the Jim Crow days were detailed in a 2008 SF Weekly cover

story "Building Racism." While the plaintiffs signed confidentiality agreements regarding the terms of the mediation last week, some of the 20 remaining plaintiffs expressed anger at the relatively paltry amount of money they were offered -- and that some of their fellow carpenters would accept it (Because of the confidentiality agreement, SF Weekly cannot reveal the exact dollar amount). 

"Eight people jumped off the wagon quick," said one of the plaintiffs

who has remained in the suit, adding that all of the plaintiffs who

chose to settle were African American -- though some African American plaintiffs remain. "They said they hadn't worked in

a year. I haven't worked either, but it's the whole idea of staying


"They're trying to sell us out," said another

plaintiff about the companies. "They're trying to conquer and

divide...It was a blue light special...It was just intimidating."

The SF Weekly

story on the case highlighted how Latinos were allegedly threatened and

even physically attacked by their supervisors on and off the work site

for complaining to the union about having to pay their superiors part

of their wages. African Americans and Latinos were allegedly assigned

to separate work crews, and the African Americans were repeatedly told

they were too slow.  

Since the story ran, new details that

would seem to corroborate the workers' accusations have emerged.

According to court documents filed in federal court this year, an

employee of the project's subcontractor, IMR, said he talked with both

AIMCO and Fortney & Weygandt about whether IMR and another

subcontractor should racially integrate the segregated work crews and

hire more African American residents of the area.

According to

the suit, the IMR employee said the decisions "were

made by committee based on the notions that Latinos would not work with

African Americans and that hiring more African-American resident

workers on the project would cost too much money because they are not

as productive as Latino (Mexican) workers." Asked to back up the

difference in productivity to the other companies, the IMR employee

said that he and a Bay Building Services employee had two teams

of four men - one team all Latino, one all black - perform the same

task and calculated that the African Americans were 40 percent as productive

as their Latino counterparts, according to the suit.


doesn't happen everyday," said the carpenters' attorney, Bob Salinas,

in reference to employers testing different races' productivity. "I

would hope."

Furthermore, the suit alleges that an AIMCO

representative serving as the project's director of construction told

the subcontractors that she didn't care if they didn't hire African

Americans. Also according to the suit, the project's vice-president of

construction allegedly referred to African Americans as "niggers" and "monkeys" during meetings with the subcontractors, saying "if they

were good workers, would they be living here?"

In subsequent

court documents, AIMCO denies all the allegations, and argues the

company cannot be held liable for the actions of the subcontractors.


the carpenters are not happy about the folks who settled with the

companies -- "I don't even want to talk to people who took the

settlement," one plaintiff said -- Salinas claims"it doesn't affect the

rights of the other plaintiffs."
"The people that are

remaining in the suit are committed to making sure that the truth about

how things happened out there comes to light," Salinas says.

  • Pin It

Tags: , , , , , ,

About The Author

Lauren Smiley


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook


  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"