Get SF Weekly Newsletters
Pin It

Old Cop, Young Cop: Police Battle Retirees Over Pensions 

Wednesday, Jun 13 2012

Jackie Mason once noted that if a crook is bothering you, you can always call a cop, but if a cop is on your case, you can't call a crook. A question pressing San Francisco is who do you call when retired cops are after you? The city's answer: A lawyer.

A legal procedure initiated earlier this year by the retirees political action committee Protect Our Benefits seeks to undo a key provision of last year's Proposition C — the "City Family" pension measure. If successful, a clause the controller's office estimated would save San Francisco $300 million over 10 years will be scrapped. Regardless, the suit has opened a rift between the city's retired and active police officers. Gary Delagnes, president of the Police Officers Association, calls the retirees' move "the epitome of greed." But the strongest backer of the Protect Our Benefits suit is the Veteran Police Officers Association (VPOA) — the POA's own retiree group.

At issue is the way the city doles out supplemental Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs). Before Prop. C's passage, the city gave its retirees a supplemental COLA whenever its retirement plan outperformed its benchmark — regardless whether it was fully funded. This led to a $170 million payout in 2010, even while the fund was still reeling from the massive losses of 2008. Prop. C did away with that; the city now will only disperse such payments when its retirement plan is fully funded. This doesn't figure to be anytime soon.

In yanking away a vested benefit without offering anything in return, the city violated retirees' state and federal constitutional rights, argues Protect Our Benefits chair Larry Barsetti — who is also, hardly coincidentally, the executive secretary of the VPOA. While it dings current workers for higher pension contributions during bad times, Prop. C holds out the possibility of lower payments during good times (even if those good times probably won't come before 2030). Retirees, however, didn't get such a quid pro quo — even an arguably illusory one. City officials last year told SF Weekly that a retiree lawsuit regarding this matter was far from unlikely and even admitted that Prop. C "pushed the envelope a little."

Protect Our Benefits is trying to earn the state Attorney General's permission to bring its suit as "the people." If denied, Barsetti says it simply will sue the city in Superior Court.

"I will not allow anyone to take away my contractual rights without negotiating with me," Barsetti continues. "The unions and the city conspired against the retirees, and I am furious, frankly. We want our rights. We're entitled to them. And we're gonna get them."

About The Author

Joe Eskenazi

Joe Eskenazi

Joe Eskenazi was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left. "Your humble narrator" was a staff writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015. He resides in the Excelsior with his wife, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed


  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"