Get SF Weekly Newsletters
Pin It

Labor-Backed Plan for "Smoothing" Pension Plans Deemed Illegal 

Wednesday, May 4 2011

With as many as three different pension reform charter amendments clogging this year's ballot, it's now more obvious than ever that there's no easy way to solve the city's runaway benefits situation. It also turns out there's no smooth way.

One of the highlights of the plan developed by the city's organized labor movement was extended "smoothing." In essence, this lowers the massive yearly contribution the city and its employees pay into its pension system by spreading the losses suffered by the pension system over a longer period of time (to be fair, it would also spread gains over more time — but that's not exactly the situation the city finds itself in these days). Labor had hoped to lengthen the smoothing period from five years to 10; at its most basic, this would have doubled the time the city allots itself to pay down its obligations to the fund.

Whether this is a wise fiscal move is debatable — it's akin to attempting to lose weight by altering the measurement system of the scale. But whether it's legal is less so.

The notion of voter-mandated pension smoothing set off "instinctive alarm bells" for Supervisor Sean Elsbernd. He asked City Attorney Dennis Herrera about it, and, late last month, Herrera's office forwarded Elsbernd a 2005 state attorney general's opinion. In a remarkably prescient precedent, California's top attorney opined that, no, the city charter cannot be used to make detailed policy for a city's retirement system. That's the job of the retirement board. Elsbernd sits on that body as well, and he did not seem eager to use an accounting trick to alleviate the city's pension obligation. "San Diego's [retirement] trustees made some actuarial changes and did some chicanery to benefit the city's general fund instead of the pension fund — and they're the ones who are civilly liable now," he says.

The pension proposals put forth by labor and Mayor Ed Lee will likely be hashed out by the Board of Supervisors until late summer. But the smoothing proposition, having been declared illegal by the city attorney, cannot be brought before the board at all.

Smoothing's rough road was an opportunity for a chuckle by pension crusader Jeff Adachi. The public defender — now the Lord Voldemort of organized labor — unearthed the AG's ruling independently. He notes that, absent the possibility of smoothing, labor's estimation its plan will save the city $100 million is due for some smoothing of its own.

About The Author

Joe Eskenazi

Joe Eskenazi

Joe Eskenazi was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left. "Your humble narrator" was a staff writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015. He resides in the Excelsior with his wife, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed


  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"