Get SF Weekly Newsletters
Pin It

A Note About SF Weekly's Editorial Independence 

Wednesday, Aug 12 2015
Comments

It's never comfortable when a news organization becomes news. We aim to tell stories about others, but occasionally the tables get turned. The spotlight's glare can be harsh, but, as is the case with most uncomfortable issues, the light tends to have an ameliorating effect.

That happened last week at the San Francisco Media Company, which publishes the San Francisco Examiner and SF Weekly. A drama played out in our newsrooms and executive offices about whether we should tailor our editorial product to appease advertisers. The result of the turmoil was that we, as a media company, reaffirm and adamantly defend the importance of an independent editorial voice and a free press for San Francisco.

Such a policy is essential for our mission to deliver trusted news to our readers, to maintain credibility among those we report on and seek to hold accountable, and to go after important stories that impact the future of the city. Those powers are only afforded to an independent press, and that is a privilege and an honor we hold dear, and one we will not give up without a fight.

It is, as they say, the whole ball game.

Only as an independent voice can we truly serve our advertisers, as well, since without that trust and integrity, the news we publish would not attract serious interest and, thus, our ads would rightly go unseen.

I am happy to report we uphold those beliefs at the Examiner and SF Weekly. Under current ownership, we have never violated that trust, and after a close call last week at SF Weekly, we hereby vow to redouble our efforts to uphold that tradition.

We had many difficult talks last week in both newsrooms. The newsrooms sit next to each other, sharing a common wall, so even though both strive to offer a unique view on the city — and occasionally scoop each other on stories — the staff of each are colleagues, and ethical issues concerning one affect the other.

Tempers overheated at times in these discussions, but in the end sanity prevailed and the danger was averted. A proposed story that would have compromised those independent values was scrapped after objections from staff.

The best remedy, and revenge, for tough times at a news publication is to do great work. And on that score, both papers distinguished themselves impeccably last week. In addition to overall great reporting on local issues, SF Weekly hit the streets last week with an outstanding issue devoted to last weekend's Outside Lands festival, and the Examiner ran hard-hitting stories all last week about allegations of corruption out of City Hall that had locals buzzing.

The crisis we faced last week, which became a public brouhaha, will potentially make us a stronger company, and it was a stark reminder of why we are here and how we can continue to best serve our readers, our advertisers, and the city. We hope you keep reading.

— Michael Howerton,

Editor in Chief, San Francisco Examiner

Vice President of Editorial,

San Francisco Media Company

About The Author

Michael Howerton

Comments


Comments are closed.

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Slideshows

  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"