Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Friday, September 25, 2009

Is the Mayor's Soda Tax a De Facto Cultural Attack?

Posted By on Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:40 PM

click to enlarge THARRIN/FLICKR
  • tharrin/Flickr
When brand-new dad Gavin Newsom, finally galvanized into action by a damning UCLA study on obesity and soft drink consumption, proposed his indirect soda tax last week -- not a tax on individual cans of corn syrupy goodness but a fee levied on retailers as varied as Safeway and corner liquor stores -- he likely wasn't counted on being called a communist. That's hyperbolic (sorry), but as reported in the Chronicle on Sunday, Muhtar Kent, Coca-Cola's CEO, did offer words of warning that very faintly cloaked broader allegations: "I've never seen it work where a government tells people what to eat and what to drink. . . If it worked, the Soviet Union would still be around." Chronicle writer Andrew S. Ross went on to point out that Arkansas, Tennessee, and Virginia have what he'd consider similar taxes.

In a situation such as this, when a public official -- a mayor no less -- wants to regulate what people put in their bodies -- directly, with the support of voters, or indirectly, by such a roundabout method only Supervisors must approve -- lawsuits are inevitable. Likewise, naysayers wonder why vendors should be taxed for selling soda, but not ice cream, or, say, sports drinks -- a slovenly vice New York City recently targeted in an ad campaign. The author of one comment on Ross's piece proposed a $25 tax on each bag of dog food sold in San Francisco, with the idea that the revenue could "fund a city-operated dog-shit clean up service" to mitigate the near-ubiquitous presence of canine feces on sidewalks and in parks.

With well-traveled logic, The Ethicurian shot down the currently still far-fetched alternative of going higher up the ladder to get corn subsidies eliminated: Such proposals die swift, unceremonious deaths in Congress. According to the same post, there's not actually solid proof removing subsidies would really even have a significant effect on the cost of corn syrup.

Since 2007, Newsom has been itching to make a splash with this. People who spend a lot of money on cheap soda are probably typically poorer than the people who spend a lot of money on unhealthy, relatively luxurious foods -- like Häagen-Dazs and pancetta. Some -- like Reason readers -- think Newsom is letting his own personal values drive his policies, and in this sense, the proposal can be construed as something of a cultural attack. We'll see how it sells. The War on Sweet Empty Calories sounds even less palatable than the War on Drugs -- not to mention less compelling fodder for rap music and gritty cop-dealer dramas on HBO.

  • Pin It

Tags: ,

About The Author

Andrew Simmons

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook

Slideshows

  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"