Get SF Weekly Newsletters

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Chronic City: Court Says Patients Can Collectively Grow Medical Marijuana

Posted By on Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:59 PM

Officer, release that plant
Some rural sheriff's departments still haven't really come to terms with the fact that medical Marijuana is now legal in California, despite having had since 1996 to adjust to the concept. But in a landmark ruling, an appellate court today protected the right of California medical Marijuana patients to collectively cultivate the herb under state law.

The California Third District Court of Appeals issued the 2-1 ruling in the case of County of Butte v. Superior Court, in which seven patients in Paradise, Calif., formed a medical Marijuana collective.

Americans for Safe Access (ASA), a nationwide medical Marijuana advocacy group, filed a lawsuit in May 2006 on behalf of 56-year-old David Williams and six other collective members after a 2005 warrantless search of Williams' home. The Butte County Sheriff's Department forced Williams to uproot more than two dozen Marijuana plants or face prosecution. Deputy Jacob Hancock told Williams that growing collectively for multiple patients was illegal; California state law, in fact, does allow for collective cultivation.

ASA's media liaison, Kris Hermes, said the group  "was compelled"

to file the Williams lawsuit "after receiving repeated reports of

unlawful behavior by Butte County law enforcement, as well as by other

police agencies throughout the state."


County Sheriff/Coroner Perry Reniff and his department had attempted to

impose a de facto ban on medical Marijuana patient collectives,

according to the ASA, which decided to pursue the case to show that

collectives and cooperatives are protected under state law.


ruling by the California courts sends yet another strong message to

state law enforcement that they must abide by the medical Marijuana

laws of the state and not the competing federal laws," said Joe Elford,

ASA chief counsel and the attorney who litigated the case on behalf of

Williams. Elford said that the propriety of Deputy Hancock's conduct

is measured by California, not federal, law.


court went further, stating that deny medical Marijuana patients

protection from warrantless intrusions and seizures by law enforcement

"would surely shock the sensibilities of the voters who approved

[Proposition 215]." The ASA found it especially noteworthy that the

court asserted the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 is not simply an

affirmative defense to criminal sanctions, but "...we see an

opportunity for an individual to request the same constitutional

guarantee of due process available to all individuals, no matter what

their status, under the state Constitution. The fact that this case

involves medical Marijuana and a qualified medical Marijuana patient

does not change these fundamental constitutional rights or an

individual's right to assert them."


decision upholds Butte County Superior Court Judge Barbara Roberts'

September 2007 ruling, in which she stated that seriously ill patients

collectively cultivating "should not be required to risk criminal

penalties and the stress and expense of a criminal trial in order to

assert their rights. Judge Roberts' ruling also rejected Butte County's

policy of requiring all members to physically participate in the

cultivation, thereby allowing collective members to "contribute


"In addition to protecting

patients' rights to collectively cultivate, the Court has reaffirmed

that medical Marijuana patients enjoy the same constitutional rights as

everyone else," said the ASA's Elford, "including the ability to file

civil rights actions when those rights are violated."


Butte County Sheriff's Department was already known for its zealous

anti-Marijuana enforcement. The first medical Marijuana supplier in the

state to be prosecuted in federal court after the passage of Prop 215

was originally arrested by Butte County officers. Chico resident Bryan

Epis received a 10-year sentence in federal court in 2002 for medical

Marijuana cultivation after Butte County officers raided his home in

1997 and seized 458 plants.

Observers say

today's court decision could have repercussions statewide in other

(predominantly rural) counties with pot-phobic local law enforcement.

  • Pin It


About The Author

Steve Elliott


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Popular Stories

  1. Most Popular Stories
  2. Stories You Missed

Like us on Facebook


  • clipping at Brava Theater Sept. 11
    Sub Pop recording artists 'clipping.' brought their brand of noise-driven experimental hip hop to the closing night of 2016's San Francisco Electronic Music Fest this past Sunday. The packed Brava Theater hosted an initially seated crowd that ended the night jumping and dancing against the front of the stage. The trio performed a set focused on their recently released Sci-Fi Horror concept album, 'Splendor & Misery', then delved into their dancier and more aggressive back catalogue, and recent single 'Wriggle'. Opening performances included local experimental electronic duo 'Tujurikkuja' and computer music artist 'Madalyn Merkey.'"