What can we say about someone with so little concern for the comfort of others that she prepares for an evening of audience-sitting by artfully arranging her hair so that it will disturb those around her? Nothing that involves the word "lady." I understand your discomfort, though, at the idea of making this request: Undoing a hairdo is something you shouldn't have to ask of a person. The need for low-flying hair at the movies should be painfully self-evident.
You would have been well within your rights to ask her politely to take down her hair -- or ask her to move to another seat where her hairstyle wouldn't create a problem.
Dear Social Grace,
I recently was "shushed" at the movies, for clapping. I told the person to "shush" herself, and she told me I was rude -- for clapping.
Via the Internet
Dear Madam or Sir,
Were you wearing your hair up, by chance? Anyway, you've helped Social Grace decide to stay in tonight.
When someone shushes you at the movies, the correct response is not "Shush yourself" but "I'm so sorry" -- or better yet, an apologetic look and an immediate cessation of noise. And when we must ask a fellow audience member to be quiet, we must do so politely. (Some of us may need to practice politely at home before trying it out in public. Hint: It rarely if ever involves calling someone else rude.)
There's just no need to applaud a film. Applause is how we show appreciation for performers. In a film, the performers cannot hear you applaud -- and more important, they cannot hold their next line until applause has ended, as stage performers do. This is why it's not customary to applaud at the cinema. Doing so drowns out the film's audio and thus disturbs those around you. If, however, you are attending a special performance and the filmmakers or performers are in attendance, you might express your enjoyment by applauding at the film's end.
Dear Social Grace,
What is the correct response to "How are you?" in an introduction or with a casual acquaintance? I know they don't really want to know how I am, but just saying "Fine" -- if I'm not fine -- doesn't seem right, because I don't want to be hypocritical. And if someone says it to me, does etiquette require me to say it back to them?
I'm Not Fine
We have a wonderful phrase in the English language, though we rarely hear it anymore, except in some parts of the United Kingdom and in countries where people have learned English solely from textbooks. That phrase is "How do you do." It's an idiom -- it doesn't mean exactly what it says. Curiously, it's not even a question.
The correct response to "How do you do" is "How do you do" -- no change in inflection, even. What it means, basically, is "This is a friendly greeting. I bear you no ill will." But a generation or so ago, this handy term fell out of favor. It was too square, man! It was what parents and authority figures said! It was hypocritical, even!
The problem is, we threw out this important phrase without a good replacement ready to take its place. We reached for a close approximation to "How do you do," and came up with "How are you?" as the best alternative. But "How are you?" is still in use as a real question. It's not like "How do you do."
I say bring back "How do you do"! There's still time; it's still clinging to life. I don't have high hopes, though. Barring the widespread return of that exquisite little phrase, you must use your wits and interpret "How are you?" each time it comes up. I know you can do it. For example, when a close friend says over brandy and cigars, "Grace, my dear, how are you?" she means the phrase literally: I'm invited to unburden myself of my cares and worries. When the ticket taker at the corner movie house says, "How are you?" he is employing an idiom that means "This is a friendly greeting." The correct response is "Fine, thank you."
Language does not always make sense. If you're feeling hypocritical about this, you're overthinking a simple phrase to a dangerous degree.
Dear Social Grace,
I am writing in regards to a letter (about the etiquette of using Caller ID to screen calls) that you printed in the July 26th SF Weekly. In your response, you said that using Caller ID to screen calls is not impolite -- but that blocking your number from display on a Caller ID box might be. Many people (including me) choose to have their numbers blocked from display on Caller ID. I do so be- cause I am a single female living in a large city, and I don't want to be confronted with a possible phone stalker if I dial an incorrect number. I have a bit of "New York" paranoia, and (perhaps unfortunately) I succumb to it in instances such as this.
The writer of the aforementioned letter can choose to have a service whereby any calls that are Caller ID-blocked can be refused automatically. When I'm confronted with this service, and it's someone I know, I'll unblock my num- ber for that call. Since I rarely call any-one I do not know, I feel this is a fair compromise.
Thank you very much for your letter. You've brought up an excellent reason for blocking one's number from Caller ID displays -- a reason I hadn't even considered, to be honest. Shame on me. I'm glad you wrote in to set me straight.