Remember, It's Best Served Cold
I had the unfortunate experience of being a resident of Arden Van Upp's (I knew her as Dee Emelak) at 272 Downey in 1994 ("The Fortress on the Hill," Dec. 30). After moving out, my roommate and I attempted to obtain our security deposit in vain. After many, many letters, efforts to process serve her, phone calls, faxes, and certified mailings, we won our court case.
We had to go to court three times, but we never saw our deposit returned. I am still paying on the debt incurred by her actions. I am included now on the list of judgments on her credit history, and I am one of many people, I'm sure, who have some form of lien on her properties. I'm sure it means nothing to her. If there was anyone deserving of public torture and financial ruin, it should be Arden Van Upp. She is a parasite on people's goodness, and a plague on the residents who in good faith rent from her. Vengeance is finally, after all these years, mine.
Preaching From the Choir
I am an educator who works with youth of color in the San Francisco Bay Area. I have also been a student organizer and youth organizer for many years. I fully support the work of Olin, and think that the group represents a turning point in Bay Area progressive organizing ("Demonstrating Exploitation," Jan. 6). It is probably one of the few -- if not the only -- truly youth-led and youth-driven political groups doing radical organizing in this so-called hotbed of progressive activity.
Your hit piece (and that's what it was) on Olin was just plain embarrassing. To you, not to Olin, which has proved in the past seven years that Latino youth can fight back and win against anti-immigrant, anti-youth, and racist attacks. Obviously, Helen Gao knows very little about grass-roots organizing, stating that Olin's efforts have produced "very little." I am a pretty jaded activist, but I am constantly amazed by the gains that Olin makes year after year.
Maybe to Gao, ethnic studies programs run by young people in underfunded and embattled public high schools like Castlemont in Oakland, Oakland High, Pittsburg High, etc. are not a big deal. As someone who works with young people and sees firsthand the major challenges they face, I see these victories as significant to educating and building a mass base of young people to fight for even bigger demands in the future.
Tsk, tsk, SF Weekly. Maybe you're trying to be too cutting-edge for your own -- and the left's -- good. Have you ever heard of the left eating its own? Well, I think you all have just swallowed your entire right arm.
Helen Gao's article "Demonstrating Exploitation," on the youth organization Olin, is a classic hit piece designed to smear radical activists of color with distortion, omission, and just plain deception. Her attack includes potshots at Olin supporters, including me, for writing a book that praises Olin's work. Calling my comments "hyperbolic" -- as if blind to my lengthy discussion of Olin's organizational problems -- she then pulls off an awesome quoting-out-of-context act. I see Olin as the "revolutionary future," Gao asserts, when I actually wrote that youth-led groups -- of all sorts, across the nation -- are key to such a future.
I would fund-raise to get the Weekly a fact checker if I thought it would help. But that's not the problem. The Weekly's new owners seem determined to trash any force for social justice, no matter the dishonest reporting required.
Helen Gao does an excellent job of making Olin victories sound bad ("Demonstrating Exploitation"). By her own words, Olin won concessions from TV (yes, Helen, protesting is heroic), BART, and the school district. If all the Olin protesters had done was to learn about the power of organized demonstration and active participation, then Olin would be a success. But Olin implemented its most important demand: ethnic studies programs.
Maybe Olin doesn't help the students with their homework. Olin goes one, two, three steps further. Olin educates, activates, and empowers. Viva Olin the victorious!
Editor's note: The letter writers take great pains to mischaracterize Helen Gao's article, which clearly explained Olin's accomplishments. The group's effectiveness, in fact, is part and parcel of the larger story that Fernandez, Martinez, and Sommers chose to ignore. As Gao explained, Olin's detractors accuse the group of exploiting schoolchildren, including middle schoolers, by encouraging them to skip school and pad the crowds at political rallies that they scarcely understand.
I tried today to read Michael Sragow's article entitled "Eight Isn't Enough" (Jan. 6). While I think I might actually agree with some of those portions of the article I could make sense out of, I wonder whether there is a more self-conscious writer on your staff or elsewhere. Would it be possible to obtain a translation into English?
Kudos to Michael Sragow ("Eight Isn't Enough"). Now we know the best movies from last year. It's about time someone exposed The Opposite of Sex, Henry Fool, and Life Is Beautiful for the "synthetic" and "incompetent" duds they were. They had plot lines I have never seen before. It was truly scary. I had to hunker down with my Michael Crichton just to wash away the confusing dialogue. I demand to be spoon-fed duplicated plots and immature themes! I strive to be rid of all the "condescending" new thought-provoking movies! Every week, I so look forward to Wednesday when Sragow's reviews tell me what is worth seeing!
What, You Think We Pay This Guy to Just Sit Around and Watch Movies?
Michael Sragow needs to see a few more flicks in 1999. Based on his choices and comments regarding the eight great for '98, it seems he does not make it to the cinema as often as I do ("Eight Isn't Enough").
He missed some truly good movies: The Celebration, Happiness, Little Voice, Pi, Smoke Signals, Steam. The only thing that his article indicates to me is that Sragow's reviews cannot be relied upon to distinguish between tripe, baloney, and a well-made film. His disapproval of Pleasantville, Saving Private Ryan, Scream 2, There's Something About Mary, and The Truman Show appears little more than a contrarian anti-populist elitism -- if the masses like it, it must stink. The use of "condescending" within the subheadline for the article must refer to Sragow.
Calm Down, Sweetie, Night Crawler's a Chick, Too
So while women continue to be victimized by males who think that women's bodies are simply objects to be masturbated towards, you seem to think this is OK ("Geeks Just Have More Fun," Night Crawler, Dec. 30).
Well, it isn't, and I suggest that white male garbage like you try reconsidering the way women are sexually assaulted thanks in large part to the porn you describe. And by the way, there is no such thing as "fourth-wave feminists," got it? Some of us are continuing to fight the white male agenda of hatred, and we will win. And some day people like you are going to need affirmative action to protect your sorry, sexist, stupid ass.
But Eliot Ness Is Dead
SF Weekly recently carried a lead article on Al "A-1" Wright, who drank his life away (" 'A-1' Wright, R.I.P.," Cothran, Dec. 23).
Why not mention the lesson -- restore Prohibition? It worked. Prohibition spread to most of the country, cutting drunkenness. Even the ill-drafted national law continued lowering drunkenness. Whereas, with repeal, auto accidents rose 20 percent back to where they had been before Prohibition. Deaths from cirrhosis, which Prohibition had halved, went right back up again. The evidence is clear: We need a Prohibition law.
It should probably be on a state level, so as to get willing enforcement. That worked before. It should work again.