Party pirates take S.F. by storm: Thanks to Silke Tudor for her exploration of pirate chic ["Pirates Be Cool," March 12]! Piratical types should know that the mutinous crew of queer performers at San Francisco in Exile (SFinX) is putting on "Booty," Saturday, April 5, 8 p.m., at the Jon Sims Center, featuring President Bush walking the plank and spoken-word performances by Elizabeth Gimbel, J'aimes, Melisa Spence, Celestina Pearl, Sara Moore, and piratologist Jessica Arndt. See www.sfinx.org for more info. Please clean your cutlasses before coming.
Sara Moore and Celestina Pearl
They be dorks, mate: Pirates be cool, my ass. As press secretary for the Partygoers, San Francisco's premier party-visiting visionaries, I seem to remember the boys spontaneously attending a "Pirate Party" back in 2000-2001 (Season 4, Episode No. 22). And, according to their firsthand accounts, the party was filled to the riggin' with dorks and dweebs.
Now, I'm not saying all pirates are dorks (the bearded man with a gun and a sword in your story seems nice), but I am saying that 80 percent of them have probably walked down that short plank to dorkdom and that percentage does not deserve a cover story in SF Weekly. How many doubloons, may I ask, did the eye-patched nerd squad pay you to run this travesty?
Paul Linton Hart
What about my fine crew?: Avast, ye scurvy bilge-blubbers!
Yer dimwitted lubber Tudor may as well patch her other eye, for she missed San Francisco's home-grown piratical treasure o' online gaming at www.puzzlepirates.com. 'Tis Yohoho!, the massively multiplayer world o' puzzling piracy, and it be in free alpharrr testing.
Be sure to print this lest we pillage yer offices in person.
Dread Ringers o' the China (Basin) Coast
This wild tale you told: It is with serious concern that I read your recent article "Love Bugs" [Dog Bites, March 12]. As the HIV operations policy leader for Kaiser Permanente, I am responsible for the implementation of HIV testing policies in Northern California and need to go on record about several issues this article describes.
There are two possibilities here: one, that a violation of confidentiality occurred as reported; or, two, that your reporter was misled or misstated his experiences. HIV, as everyone knows, is a serious public health threat. One major advancement in the battle against this epidemic is the HIV antibody test, yet there is great resistance to being tested by many people who are at risk for acquiring and/or transmitting the disease.
A major reason for the resistance is concern over confidentiality; fear of an occurrence as described in this article may be why almost a third of individuals who are infected don't know it. For this reason confidentiality regarding the HIV test and its results are protected to a much higher degree than other more routine aspects of a person's medical record.
In fact, in California inappropriate release of HIV test results has both civil and criminal consequences. At Kaiser Permanente, there are several policies in place to protect the confidentiality of our members. These policies and practices bring into question the accuracy of this story.
First, HIV test results are NOT available on our internal computer system. Even if a doctor wanted to look up a patient's HIV test result on their computer screen, they wouldn't find it. For added confidentiality, it is simply not there. Second, HIV test results are only reported back to the provider who ordered the test. For anyone else to find out if a patient has had an HIV test and the results of that test, they would have to order that patient's medical chart and a record would be kept of all individuals that had access to that chart.
Third, to "look up" any test other than HIV a doctor would need the medical record number of the patient. Not the name alone. Anyone who is a Kaiser Permanente member knows that if you call, you need your number (or your full name, date of birth, and other identifying information so your medical record number can be obtained).
For the disclosure of an HIV test result to have occurred in the manner described, the two individuals in this story would have had to trade medical record numbers in addition to names and phone numbers. Coincidentally, they would have had to have the test ordered by the same doctor, and THEN that doctor would have to have been willing to be subject themselves to severe disciplinary action up to and including immediate termination with the added possibility of criminal prosecution.
Even the best systems do fail however, and I wish to assure your readers that I will investigate this claim and do everything in my power to assure that Kaiser Permanente is a safe and confidential location to be tested for HIV. I would ask that the Weekly and its writers apply the same caution to their stories, columns, and feature pieces about this deadly disease.
Cops with no supervision? What a great idea!: Matt Smith didn't directly ask, but at least one mayoral candidate supports real police reform ["Fajita Backlash," March 12]. Mike Denny answered a similar challenge from your Ammiano-shilling colleagues at the Bay Guardian with a fairly radical proposal. Not only should the mayor be more of a manager and less of a king, Mike wants to give control over police and fire stations to the rank and file, bypassing the political brass altogether!
I'm a die-hard libertarian, and I don't think I would have had the balls to say that in public. Mike did, even if the other paper was too shy to print it.
Editor's note: Maden is chairman of the Libertarian Party of San Francisco and a volunteer for the Michael Denny for Mayor campaign.
They're all damned sissies!: "Junior" and others who want to get out of the military when war is imminent are simply cowards that greedily accepted the benefits of being in the Reserve system, but are unwilling to live up to their obligations ["Nervous in the Service," Bay View, March 12].
How in the world does he or any other person think they can just "give back the money"? He was provided with several months of excellent training, both mental and physical. He was provided with job training and college money. He should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law and all his coward supporters should suffer with him.
The writer of this article, who referred to our president as "belligerent," is part of the problem with this country. It is full of weak-kneed liberalism and anti-military sentiment. We soldiers do the job that lesser men and women lack the courage and strength to do. If you fall into that category, you should thank a service member for his or her duty, not berate us or our mission.
I am becoming intolerant of the cowards in this country and the media attention they are receiving. Your freedom is won from the blood of men like me and our brothers and sisters in arms. Either support our military or go live in a country that we are liberating. You suck.
Dumber than a box of rocks: Shame on the U.S. Marine Corps for allowing a recruit as stupid as "Junior" to join up! Al Qaeda terrorists killed 3,500 innocent civilians and he didn't think the U.S. government was going to do something about it?
Osama and Saddam are part of the same outfit, and doing nothing is just an invitation for the next bunch to perhaps fly a hijacked airliner into another office building, maybe like the one the people in your office work in. If Junior wasn't prepared to defend his country, he shouldn't have joined up and the USMC shouldn't have let him. It's kind of like becoming a firefighter and then refusing to go on a call because you're afraid of fire.
Would you want to live in a city where the fire department didn't show up because they were too scared? What did Junior think that Marines really do?