I have an additional concern, one not mentioned in your article. As a lawyer who has assisted over 100 Chinese Falun Gong practitioners obtain political asylum, I am troubled to see the asylum laws abused by opportunists masquerading as Falun Gong practitioners. With the word out that the INS is soft on Falun Gong, unscrupulous paralegal outfits encourage their customers to fabricate asylum claims based on membership in the meditation sect. It's quick money for the paralegal and a quick green card for the client. And given that the normal green card process is both lengthy and costly, it's a temptation many cannot resist.
Baughman & Wang
San FranciscoWatch Those Stereotypes
After watching several films at the Asian American Film Festival, I happened upon your most recent issue ("A Piece of the Affirmative Action," March 8). I am highly supportive of SF Weekly and its journalism, but I was displeased with the artwork that depicted the stereotypical "Dragon Lady" on the front cover. As an Asian-American living in the Bay Area, I feel that this is a poor representation of our large interethnic community. I understand that there is a fine line between a "stereotype" and satire, but there should be a more defined line. Please help stop the stereotyping.
Don't Buy the Spam
I would just like to comment on this article and the potential/actual controversies that have managed to arise from it ("A Piece of the Affirmative Action"). It's 1 a.m., and I just received an e-mail about the cover of SF Weekly. Thanks to that e-mail, I'm going to lose an hour of precious sleep to vent about it.
The original sender of the e-mail (and I'm sure others are feeling likewise) alluded that the nature of this article may be potentially offensive to the Asian community because of its corresponding front-page graphic depicting an "Asian Betty Page" holding a fan-folded $50 bill. I believe otherwise.
People receiving this e-mail, and viewing the attached graphic, are at an unfair advantage in judging it because the original sender failed to summarize the article that goes with the picture. I was almost suckered into this thinking, too.
Luckily, I had the nerve to read the actual article and have a different stance on it. Firstly, I'd like to say that I'm not fervently supportive of affirmative action programs. Yet I'm quite saddened by the principle behind the act of Nancy Luu.
What I got from this article was that Luu has allegedly stolen opportunities from her Asian community. Sure, someone could argue that it only appears that way because she just happened to be working through the Educational Opportunity Program, but it is very ironic that she would embezzle money from a program (EOP) that originated from a policy (affirmative action) that probably helped her get into the position to embezzle funds. Isn't that what affirmative action is: helping historically underrepresented groups catch up with the rest of white America? It's very ironic ... and very sad. What can be said about the alleged actions of Luu? I think her crime of betraying minorities and the system that "helps" them outweighs the underlying racism the original sender accuses SF Weekly of, and I suggest your offended readers remember that.
I just read your great article online about the Cheeseballs, Tainted Love, etc. ("Street Hassles," Riff Raff, March 15). I am glad you ran the Wall Street Journal bit. Yeah, most of us don't get that paper. We hardly can pay rent.
Anyway, the scene sucks, and I blame it in part, however small, on the local media. I can hardly thumb through the local papers without seeing bands featuring one or two members who also work for the same paper(s). WE ALL KNOW who I mean (then I go see these bands and, like, 10 of their fellow staff members are there, the end).
What is up with that? I also blame the local media for continuously focusing on cover bands in one way or another. Hell, I can think of 10 angles on Tainted Love alone right now myself. But "no-brainer journalism" is just that. I know most of the papers are free, but filler isn't filling anything besides the recycling bins. It's enough to make me skip them for a few months. I admit I am addicted to S.F. free papers. Also, when I say media, of course I mean radio also, and TV.
I hope that some of this changes and more focus shifts to the little local bands like the one I'm in. We celebrate five years of playing out in clubs today! We played at the Edinburgh Castle March 15, 1995, as a quiet-core trio, and did The Howard Stern Show in October 1999, as you know. In between, we've been lucky enough to receive (we've been told) more than our fair share of ink, radio, and TV coverage, for which I am truly grateful, and give thanks often. But we are one of the few lucky exceptions.
I refuse to have to move to get attention, when we've been here five years and established our small following/fans, plus I enjoy a domestic partner status with timmi-kat partner David Cole in this county. We celebrate our own anniversary next month. Nine years! I know that most of the bands that do leave (to N.Y. and L.A., etc.) will get swallowed up, and that's a shame. But hey, make more room for Third Eye Blind, and Brown-Star, and our friends.
It can only excite everyone, the bands themselves, their small fan bases, and inspire everyone to greatness and a higher level of excellence. IT COULD HAPPEN PEOPLE. Well, it could also at least make the mags more interesting and varied.
Chicken Dance Purity
Just for clarity's sake, "The Chicken (Duck) Dance" isn't a Polkacide original (The House of Tudor, Feb. 23). The Cooks Bros. Catalogue sells a chicken (made in China) that flaps its wings to the tune (they CERTAINLY didn't hear it from Polkacide first) and I've heard the tune (and seen the dance) at more than one traditional Octoberfest (albeit in the area, so I guess they COULD have been covering a Polkacide original but I'd bet money that's not the case). As of a few years ago, "The Wiener Dog Song" (Neil Bassa's creation) was the only original (at least according to Bassa), but that certainly doesn't rule out the possibility that they could have written "Loser's Waltz" in the time since.
No big deal -- but the "Chicken Dance" misappropriation seemed a little glaring. I love Silke Tudor's writing and I read her every week nonetheless.
Via InternetEdit the Best
SF Weekly is looking for an associate editor who has a fine touch with copy, a firm grasp of the magazine style, and the autodidactic erudition needed to work comfortably with a staff full of writers who routinely win major national journalism awards. The ideal candidate for this position will have at least five years of experience at major newspapers and/or magazines, the demonstrated ability to deal with lengthy news and feature articles, and the desire to edit and write to the highest standards. Applicants should send a short, arresting cover letter, a one-page résumé, and a representative set of writing and editing clips to:
185 Berry, Suite 3800
San Francisco, CA 94107
Please, no phone calls.Distribution: SF Weekly is available free of charge in the Bay Area, limited to one copy per reader. SF Weekly may be distributed only by SF Weekly's authorized independent contractors or SF Weekly's authorized distributors. No person may, without prior written permission of SF Weekly, take more than one copy of each SF Weekly issue.
Copyright: The entire contents of SF Weekly are Copyright 2000 by New Times Inc. No portion may be reproduced in whole or in part by any means including electronic retrieval systems without the expressed written permission of the publisher.
SF Weekly (ISSN 1060-2526) is published weekly by New Times Inc., 185 Berry, Suite 3800, San Francisco, CA 94107. Periodicals Postage Paid at San Francisco, CA, and additional mailing offices.
Postmaster: Send address changes to SF Weekly, 185 Berry, Suite 3800, San Francisco, CA 94107. Domestic subscriptions may be purchased for $40 for six months or for $80 for 12 months. Mail to: Subscriptions/SF Weekly, 185 Berry, Suite 3800, San Francisco, CA 94107.
Editorial Submissions: All letters and unsolicited materials are greatly appreciated; we return only those with SASE. Letters PolicyWe welcome letters to the editor via mail, e-mail, or fax. Letters may be edited for length and clarity, and must include your name, address, and daytime phone number (for confirmation only).
Mail: Letters, SF Weekly, 185 Berry, Suite 3800, San Francisco, CA 94107
Fax: 777-1839 Moon Trent